TY - JOUR
T1 - An artificial intelligence-based EEG algorithm for detection of epileptiform EEG discharges: Validation against the diagnostic gold standard
AU - Fürbass, Franz
AU - Kural, Mustafa Aykut
AU - Gritsch, Gerhard
AU - Hartmann, Manfred
AU - Kluge, Tilmann
AU - Beniczky, Sándor
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Objective
To validate an artificial intelligence-based computer algorithm for detection of epileptiform EEG discharges (EDs) and subsequent identification of patients with epilepsy.
Methods
We developed an algorithm for automatic detection of EDs, based on a novel deep learning method that requires a low amount of labeled EEG data for training. Detected EDs are automatically grouped into clusters, consisting of the same type of EDs, for rapid visual inspection. We validated the algorithm on an independent dataset of 100 patients with sharp transients in their EEG recordings (54 with epilepsy and 46 with non-epileptic paroxysmal events). The diagnostic gold standard was derived from the video-EEG recordings of the patients´ habitual events.
Results
The algorithm had a sensitivity of 89% for identifying EEGs with EDs recorded from patients with epilepsy, a specificity of 70%, and an overall accuracy of 80%.
Conclusions
Automated detection of EDs using an artificial intelligence-based computer algorithm had a high sensitivity. Human (expert) supervision is still necessary for confirming the clusters of detected EDs and for describing clinical correlations. Further studies on different patient populations will be needed to confirm our results.
Significance
The automated algorithm we describe here is a useful tool, assisting neurophysiologist in rapid assessment of EEG recordings.
AB - Objective
To validate an artificial intelligence-based computer algorithm for detection of epileptiform EEG discharges (EDs) and subsequent identification of patients with epilepsy.
Methods
We developed an algorithm for automatic detection of EDs, based on a novel deep learning method that requires a low amount of labeled EEG data for training. Detected EDs are automatically grouped into clusters, consisting of the same type of EDs, for rapid visual inspection. We validated the algorithm on an independent dataset of 100 patients with sharp transients in their EEG recordings (54 with epilepsy and 46 with non-epileptic paroxysmal events). The diagnostic gold standard was derived from the video-EEG recordings of the patients´ habitual events.
Results
The algorithm had a sensitivity of 89% for identifying EEGs with EDs recorded from patients with epilepsy, a specificity of 70%, and an overall accuracy of 80%.
Conclusions
Automated detection of EDs using an artificial intelligence-based computer algorithm had a high sensitivity. Human (expert) supervision is still necessary for confirming the clusters of detected EDs and for describing clinical correlations. Further studies on different patient populations will be needed to confirm our results.
Significance
The automated algorithm we describe here is a useful tool, assisting neurophysiologist in rapid assessment of EEG recordings.
KW - Automatic spike detectionM;Biomarker;Deep learning;EEG;Interictal epileptiform; discharges;Epilepsy
KW - Automatic spike detectionM;Biomarker;Deep learning;EEG;Interictal epileptiform; discharges;Epilepsy
U2 - 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.02.032
DO - 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.02.032
M3 - Article
SN - 1388-2457
SP - 1174
EP - 1179
JO - Clinical Neurophysiology
JF - Clinical Neurophysiology
ER -