Comparison of Two CFD Approaches Using Constant and Temperature Dependent Heat Capacities during the Phase Transition in PCMs with Experimental and Analytical Results

Christoph Reichl; Svenja Both; Philipp Mascherbauer; Johann Emhofer

doi:10.3390/pr100203022

Comparison of Two CFD Approaches Using Constant and Temperature Dependent Heat Capacities during the Phase Transition in PCMs with Experimental and Analytical Results

Christoph Reichl, Svenja Both, Philipp Mascherbauer, Johann Emhofer

Sustainable Thermal Energy Systems

Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Begutachtung

Originalsprache	Englisch
Seiten (von - bis)	25
Seitenumfang	1
Fachzeitschrift	Processes
Volume	10
Issue	302
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3390/pr100203022
Publikationsstatus	Veröffentlicht - 2022

Research Field

Ehemaliges Research Field - Digitalisation and HVAC Technologies in Buildings

Zugriff auf Dokument

10.3390/pr100203022Lizenz: Nicht angegeben

Diese Publikation zitieren

@article{6599026101a2444e9f5edd30d7ccf1b5,

title = "Comparison of Two CFD Approaches Using Constant and Temperature Dependent Heat Capacities during the Phase Transition in PCMs with Experimental and Analytical Results",

author = "Christoph Reichl and Svenja Both and Philipp Mascherbauer and Johann Emhofer",

year = "2022",

doi = "10.3390/pr100203022",

language = "English",

volume = "10",

pages = "25",

journal = "Processes",

issn = "2227-9717",

publisher = "MDPI AG",

number = "302",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of Two CFD Approaches Using Constant and Temperature Dependent Heat Capacities during the Phase Transition in PCMs with Experimental and Analytical Results

AU - Reichl, Christoph

AU - Both, Svenja

AU - Mascherbauer, Philipp

AU - Emhofer, Johann

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

U2 - 10.3390/pr100203022

DO - 10.3390/pr100203022

M3 - Article

SN - 2227-9717

VL - 10

SP - 25

JO - Processes

JF - Processes

IS - 302

ER -