TY - JOUR
T1 - Electrochemical and electronic detection of biomarkers in serum: a systematic comparison using aptamer-functionalized surfaces
AU - Mishyn, Vladyslav
AU - Loureiro Fidalgo do Vale Rodrigues, Teresa Isabel
AU - Leroux, Yann R.
AU - Butruille, Laura
AU - Woitrain, Eloise
AU - Montaigne, David
AU - Aspermair, Patrik
AU - Happy, Henri
AU - Knoll, Wolfgang
AU - Boukherroub, Rabah
AU - Szunerits, Sabine
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Sensitive and selective detection of biomarkers in serum in a short time has a significant impact on health. The enormous clinical importance of developing reliable methods and devices for testing serum levels of cardiac troponin I (cTnI), which are directly correlated to acute myocardial infarction (AMI), has spurred an unmatched race among researchers for the development of highly sensitive and cost-effective sensing formats to be able to differentiate patients with early onset of cardiac injury from healthy individuals with a mean cTnI level of 26 pg mL−1. Electronic- and electrochemical-based detection schemes allow for fast and quantitative detection not otherwise possible at the point of care. Such approaches rely largely on voltammetric and field-effect-based readouts. Here, we systematically investigate electric and electrochemical point-of-care sensors for the detection of cTnI in serum samples by using the same surface receptors, cTnI aptamer-functionalized CVD graphene-coated interdigated gold electrodes. The analytical performances of both sensors are comparable with a limit of detection (LoD) of 5.7 ± 0.6 pg mL−1(electrochemical) and 3.3 ± 1.2 pg mL−1 (electric). However, both sensors exhibit different equilibrium dissociation constant (KD) values between the aptamer-linked surface receptor and the cTnI analyte, being 160 pg mL−1 for the electrochemical and about three times lower for the electrical approach with KD = 51.4 pg mL−1. This difference is believed to be related to the use of a redox mediator in the electrochemical sensor for readout. The ability of the redox mediator to diffuse from the solution to the surface via the cTnI/aptamer interface is hindered, correlating to higher KD values. In contrast, the electric readout has the advantage of being label-free with a sensing limitation due to ionic strength effects, which can be limited using poly(ethylene) glycol surface ligands.
AB - Sensitive and selective detection of biomarkers in serum in a short time has a significant impact on health. The enormous clinical importance of developing reliable methods and devices for testing serum levels of cardiac troponin I (cTnI), which are directly correlated to acute myocardial infarction (AMI), has spurred an unmatched race among researchers for the development of highly sensitive and cost-effective sensing formats to be able to differentiate patients with early onset of cardiac injury from healthy individuals with a mean cTnI level of 26 pg mL−1. Electronic- and electrochemical-based detection schemes allow for fast and quantitative detection not otherwise possible at the point of care. Such approaches rely largely on voltammetric and field-effect-based readouts. Here, we systematically investigate electric and electrochemical point-of-care sensors for the detection of cTnI in serum samples by using the same surface receptors, cTnI aptamer-functionalized CVD graphene-coated interdigated gold electrodes. The analytical performances of both sensors are comparable with a limit of detection (LoD) of 5.7 ± 0.6 pg mL−1(electrochemical) and 3.3 ± 1.2 pg mL−1 (electric). However, both sensors exhibit different equilibrium dissociation constant (KD) values between the aptamer-linked surface receptor and the cTnI analyte, being 160 pg mL−1 for the electrochemical and about three times lower for the electrical approach with KD = 51.4 pg mL−1. This difference is believed to be related to the use of a redox mediator in the electrochemical sensor for readout. The ability of the redox mediator to diffuse from the solution to the surface via the cTnI/aptamer interface is hindered, correlating to higher KD values. In contrast, the electric readout has the advantage of being label-free with a sensing limitation due to ionic strength effects, which can be limited using poly(ethylene) glycol surface ligands.
U2 - 10.1007/s00216-021-03658-0
DO - 10.1007/s00216-021-03658-0
M3 - Article
SN - 1618-2642
VL - 414
JO - Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
JF - Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
IS - 18
ER -