Uncertainties in Greenhouse Gas Inventories - Evaluation, comparability and implications

Kristin Rypdal, Wilfried Winiwarter

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikel

Abstract

This paper reviews quantitative assessments of uncertainty in level and trend in national greenhouse gas inventories. The reported uncertainty in the level of high-quality greenhouse gas inventories ranges from +-5-20% in studies of five industrialised countries. The differences in uncertainty are, in particular, due to different subjective assessment of the uncertainty in emissions of nitrous oxide from agricultural soils. The fraction of CO2 in the inventory has little effect on the uncertainty. The uncertainties in trends are about +-4-5 percentage points for those countries that have made estimates. High uncertainties of emission levels indicate potential for improvements and, consequently, recalculations. Recalculations will reduce uncertainty, but might also cause practical problems. A high uncertainty in the emission level for large emission sources may be an obstacle for assessing cost-effective reduction strategies as well as for designing effective systems of emission trading. This could imply that the more uncertain emission sources should be excluded from emission trading. Alternatively, subjective uncertainty estimates may be expressed in terms of an economic risk of recalculation. The latter system may allow a market-based encouragement to reduce emission uncertainty. Reductions in uncertainties are anticipated in the future. However, it will be extremely difficult to reduce the trend uncertainty. Trend uncertainties may consequently remain high compared with the emission reduction targets in the Kyoto protocol.
OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)107-116
Seitenumfang10
FachzeitschriftEnvironmental Science and Policy
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2001

Research Field

  • Nicht definiert

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Uncertainties in Greenhouse Gas Inventories - Evaluation, comparability and implications“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Diese Publikation zitieren