What a Difference a p(TA) Makes: Policy-Makers, Experts and the Public in Decision-Making on Risky Technologies

Erich Griessler, Peter Biegelbauer

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelBegutachtung

Abstract

It is almost a truism that technological innovation does not only hold great promises, but often involves substantial risks and even ethical problems. Thus, the question arises, who is going to decide on such ambiguous technologies in what way. The project CIT-PART studied comparatively the use and impact of participatory technology assessment (pTA) and expert-based technology assessment (TA) in science and technology policy in several EU Member States and organizations such as Austria (AT), Canada (CA), Denmark (DK), the European Commission (EC), Great Britain (GB), The Holy See (VA), Italy (IT), Latvia (LV), The Netherlands (NL), the OECD, Sweden (SE), and Switzerland (CH).
OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)54-57
Seitenumfang4
FachzeitschriftTechnikfolgenabschätzung - Theorie und Praxis
Issue3
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2012

Research Field

  • Ehemaliges Research Field - Innovation Systems and Policy

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „What a Difference a p(TA) Makes: Policy-Makers, Experts and the Public in Decision-Making on Risky Technologies“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Diese Publikation zitieren