Abstract
Background:
The aging population's need for treatment of chronic diseases is exhibiting a marked increase in urgency, with heart failure being one of the most severe diseases in this regard. To improve outpatient care of these patients
and reduce hospitalization rates, the telemedical disease management program HerzMobil was developed in the past.
Objective:
This work aims to analyze the inter-annotator variability among two professional groups (healthcare and
engineering) involved in this program's annotation process of free-text clinical notes using categories. Methods: A dataset of 1,300 text snippets was annotated by 13 annotators with different backgrounds. Inter-annotator variability and accuracy were evaluated using the F1-score and analyzed for differences between categories,
annotators, and their professional backgrounds.
Results:
The results show a significant difference between note categories concerning inter-annotator variability (p<0.0001) and accuracy (p<0.0001). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two annotator groups, neither concerning inter-annotator variability (p=0.15) nor accuracy (p=0.84).
Conclusion:
Professional background had no significant impact on the annotation of free-text HerzMobil notes.
The aging population's need for treatment of chronic diseases is exhibiting a marked increase in urgency, with heart failure being one of the most severe diseases in this regard. To improve outpatient care of these patients
and reduce hospitalization rates, the telemedical disease management program HerzMobil was developed in the past.
Objective:
This work aims to analyze the inter-annotator variability among two professional groups (healthcare and
engineering) involved in this program's annotation process of free-text clinical notes using categories. Methods: A dataset of 1,300 text snippets was annotated by 13 annotators with different backgrounds. Inter-annotator variability and accuracy were evaluated using the F1-score and analyzed for differences between categories,
annotators, and their professional backgrounds.
Results:
The results show a significant difference between note categories concerning inter-annotator variability (p<0.0001) and accuracy (p<0.0001). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two annotator groups, neither concerning inter-annotator variability (p=0.15) nor accuracy (p=0.84).
Conclusion:
Professional background had no significant impact on the annotation of free-text HerzMobil notes.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | dHealth 2023 |
Subtitle of host publication | Proceedings of the 17th Health Informatics Meets Digital Health Conference |
Editors | Bernhard Pfeifer, Günter Schreier, Martin Baumgartner, Dieter Hayn |
Publisher | IOS Press BV |
Pages | 248 - 253 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Volume | 301 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 978-1-64368-387-4 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-1-64368-386-7 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2 May 2023 |
Event | dHealth 2023 - 17th Annual Conference on Health Informatics meets Digital Health - Apothekertrakt / Schönbrunn Palace, Vienna, Austria, Vienna, Austria Duration: 16 May 2023 → 17 May 2023 https://dhealth.at/ |
Publication series
Name | Studies in Health Technology and Informatics |
---|---|
Publisher | IOS Press |
Volume | 301 |
ISSN (Print) | 0926-9630 |
ISSN (Electronic) | 1879-8365 |
Conference
Conference | dHealth 2023 - 17th Annual Conference on Health Informatics meets Digital Health |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | dHealth 2023 |
Country/Territory | Austria |
City | Vienna |
Period | 16/05/23 → 17/05/23 |
Internet address |
Research Field
- Exploration of Digital Health
Keywords
- telemedicine
- heart failure
- Natural Language Processing
- Electronic Health Records
- Austria